QUESTION 5 OF 23 PRESIDING QUESTIONS FOR 2023 PRESIDENTIAL QUESTS: THEIR AMBITIONS VERSUS OUR CONVICTIONS
A certain degree of
“legal, geographic, administrative, political and economic” control of
resources by subnational units is essential for substantial progress and
development to reach over 98% of the estimated 206 million Nigerians who reside
and work within the 36 States and 774 Local Government Areas (LGAs). The
constitution-backed “Pocket money syndrome” entrenched in the Nigerian Federation
and driven by the Federal Government (like an aged father) via central exploration
of resources, revenue collection & monthly revenue-sharing is unacceptable.
The custom of doling out stipends from this central purse (majorly from oil
proceeds) to 36 able-bodied children, 1 nephew and 774 grandchildren (36 States,
Federal Capital Territory [FCT] & 774 Local Government Areas [LGAs]) is an
abysmal management practice that has killed the creativity of the subnational
governments and made them permanent dependents of the ego-tripping Federal
Government for over 60 years.
As a matter of fact,
the current over-centralized economic model (resources’ exploration, revenue derivation
and revenue sharing) is more beneficial to a few powerful members of the elite
club who are close to the seat of power in Abuja (where less than 2% of our
population reside and work) than to the average Nigerian (over 98% of our
population). Worse still, this ‘sharing mentality’ has made enormous ‘free
money’ available to Abuja-bound political office holders, top Federal civil
servants & government contractors and consequently made Nigerians to
wrongly believe that our “land flows with milk and honey” endlessly.
However, for the sub-nationals
to be liberated from this legal and mental bondage that is supported by the military-packaged
1999 constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) and
experience massive economic revolution, it is better to constitutionally devolve
appropriate powers (“legal, geographical, administrative, political and
economic”) to them to allow for a high degree of self-reliance via resource
exploration and revenue generation within their individual areas of comparative
advantage and pay royalties to the Central government. Specifically, the
economic autonomy to be granted States & LGAs with high-income mineral resources
such as oil, gold, bitumen etc. post-devolution may come with a caveat that a ‘reasonable
percentage’ of the revenue from these non-renewable resources be remitted to
the central purse for onward distribution to other States & LGAs to
complement their revenues.
Given that several
States have a litany of untapped natural resources, Governors would better
navigate the destinies of their individual States for revenue pooling while LGA
Council Chairmen are more likely to significantly drive development within
their respective domains if these two subnational authorities don’t have to
wait for either the Federal Government’s ‘readiness’ or ‘interest’ in the exploitation
of the resources within their domains.
a. I strongly agree b.
I agree c. I disagree d. I strongly disagree
Dr. Adetolu Ademujimi is a Medical Doctor, Author, Reformer, Coach and Public Policy expert who wrote in from Akure in Nigeria. Email: ademujimi@yahoo.co.uk; Twitter: @toluademujimi; Instagram: @adetoluademujimi; Linkedin: @adetolu ademujimi
Comments
Post a Comment